I've mentioned this before here, but it bears repeating: I don't like it when people don't factor price into their assessment of whisky. The whole "This review was done without factoring in the price of the whisky" thing really grinds my gears because I pay for my whisky. The quality of the whisky cross referenced with the price greatly affects my enjoyment of it. Case-in-point: these Method & Madness Irish Whiskies. I got the Single Grain, this Single Malt, and the Single Pot Still for 50% off SRP. When I rated the Single Grain, I was surprised at how much I liked it and gave it a 3.5 based on getting it for $32.50 rather than $65. I even went out and picked up a second $32.50 bottle right after to keep in the coffers. Strange thing about it though, despite the 3.5 and the fact I bought a second bottle, I couldn't recommend rushing out to grab one at $65. So what would my rating have been if I'd had to pay $65 for it? I'd probably have docked it half-a-point and let it stand at a straight 3.0. I didn't think about this at the time I rated that. I'm thinking about it more now because the Method & Madness Single Malt is $85 at SRP and frankly, it isn't as good as the Single Grain. So even though I nabbed this one for $42.50, I didn't jump at the chance to get a second bottle at that price and I could have. The one that went quickest, surprise surprise, is also the one generally better rated, the Single Pot Still, which lands also between the two price-wise for an SRP of $75 (for me it was $37.50). Thus I'm in that conundrum zone when it comes to the star rating at least: at the price I paid, I might give it a 3.0. At SRP, I can't really recommend anyone rush out and pick this up, not that it's bad. It's simply overpriced. It's the type of whisky where, if a friend were to pour you a glass at their house and hand it to you, you'd gladly drink it. Depending on how you feel about Irish whisky and how well you know the friend, you might ask for another. Or, if you friend offers another, you might simply say, what else you got? My first ever distiller review was for Writer's Tears Copper Pot. I gave it a 2.75. It would make for a wonderful intro Irish Whisky, but after 20 years of tastings, it's not my speed, and honestly, I think the Copper Pot might be better than this M&M Single Malt. This is also odd given, from what I've read, there's some 14 year old stock in here. Is it all 14 year old? How much younger stock is mixed in? Dunno. Thing is, the aroma here is so faint. I poured the glass ten minutes ago and I've decided to let it sit to see if I can tease something out, because I've had pours on other nights where I've just gone to sipping and the nose was faint then too. As I've let it sit, I'm getting a stronger aroma of a combination of orange and shortbread, sort of a citrus cookie aroma that's pleasant enough. There's maybe a slight edge of vanilla, but if a whisky doesn't smell like chocolate, there's usually a trace of vanilla in there, isn't there? Is it $85 pleasant? Not at all. I'm not sure it's $42.50 pleasant. For $42.50, you can get Knappogue Castle, which also had a faint nose and is on par with this. I'd probably rate them about the same (though it's been a year or two since I had Knappogue). I've also seen Tullamore 12 on sale around here for $43, and if memory serves, I preferred that, though again, I'm basing that on memories of a year or two ago. But that's just the nose. The palate is better and might actually be worth the clearance price. The citrus is strong with the orange note on the nose remaining but evolving toward marmalade and into pineapple in the back end toward the finish. The cookie quality is there with a slight trace of butteriness. And of course, there's a little bit of vanilla, but you know, see my note about vanilla above. There's also a little apple, which is odd because apple and orange are fabled to not go together, but then again, they don't hit at the same time. It has a longer finish that a lot of the Irish whisky I've had, and with its strong citrus creamy edge, I'd say this reminds me of Green Spot Chateau Leoville Barton, but the Green Spot has a creamier fuller mouthfeel that I'd favor if you can get that for $65, which is what it goes for in my neck of the woods. Speaking of wood, that was actually what I liked about the M&M Single Grain, the pencil shavings coupled with the sweetness. It's what made me buy a second bottle. This Single Malt certainly is not a bad whisky, but when you consider that it goes for $84 a bottle at SRP which is the same price as Talisker Distiller's Edition or Laphroaig Cask Strength or the Templeton 10 Year Single Barrel Rye I just reviewed, it's hard to think that this is the bottle you're going to choose unless you favor Irish above scotch or rye, and maybe that's your bag. It's not mine, and I didn't opt for a second bottle of this. Still, I'm going to stick with a 3.0 on this one. Quality wise, it is a touch above that Writer's Tears of my first distiller review (and of course, I'd be remiss if I don't say I also prefer their Double Oak to this, though at $60 that's now madly overpriced). I don't know, I guess I'm getting to that point where price matters and everything seemed to expensive. It's possible we're just getting to that point where I feel like Danny Glover: "I'm getting too old for this shit." The prices these days are starting to make me cranky. Give me the best value column so I know where I'm getting the bang for my buck, people. That's all I ask.
Method and Madness Single Malt Enhanced With French Oak Casks
About this bottle
Method and Madness is the experimental microdistillery located at Midleton Distillery where Irish whiskey brands like Jameson and Redbreast among many others are produced. Method and Madness Single Malt is initially aged in ex-bourbon barrels, but part of the single malt finishes its maturation in French Limousin oak. This type of oak is most commonly used to age cognac. Bottled at 92 proof.
Reviews
Showing the most detailed of 23 parsed reviews.
Irish whiskey tasting, The Oak Barrel, Sydney, 7 Feb 2019. Whisky #4 Nose: Dried fruit, toasted cereal grains, roasted almonds, a little vanilla, leather, and a dark floral sweetness reminiscent of apricot liqueur. Palate: Full, rich arrival with abounding malty flavours - dark honey, slightly bitter syrup, apple, walnut. There's a firm tannic note from the oak but it's balanced by some vanilla and a dark treacle flavour. The texture is medium-bodied and very agreeable. Finish: Medium. A pleasant fruity grainy quality with a nutty aftertaste. The nose is less flowery-floral than some Irish whiskey, with the malted grain providing an earthy depth. It's a complex whiskey that is nonetheless easy to drink, with a nuanced balance between sweet cereal and dry oak notes. It has a resolute and uncompromising profile similar to Balblair. Very enjoyable neat, and a dash of water brings out further sweetness, if that is your preference, without unbalancing the profile. The distillate was sourced from Midleton and maturation was in ex-bourbon barrels followed by finishing in Limousin oak casks. An enjoyable and interesting whiskey that is well worth the asking price. "Very Good" : 85/100 (4 stars)
When I saw this bottle on offer for 35 €, I simply couldn't help myself. A 14-year-old Irish malt with a craft presentation? That's a no brainer. Appealing notes of orchard fruits, ginger and Belgian waffles ascend from the glass, and there are hints of lemon zest, physalis and honey. On the palate, creamy toffee, fresh apples and oak spices gravitate towards mango, walnuts and a touch of juniper. The slightly resinous finish accentuates caffè latte, salted caramel and guava. Again, I couldn't help myself and bought three backup bottles, make of that what you will. RATING: 3.7/5.0 stars ≙ 85 pts → ABOVE AVERAGE [+]
Tight, high and slightly heathery nose. Very much in line with what we expect from an Irish, some citrus, a lot of sweet malt, rich caramel, toffee, cocoa, brioche and even a bit of saline. No surprises here, and that's a good thing. An extremely tasty and well done spirit. Bring a case of this one to a desert island.
Nose: very sweet, butter cookies and some fruit, maybe peaches and some orange? Taste: very fruity and sweet. orange and more butter cookies. It has a bitter ending, but in a very good way. The higher proof is also noticeable. Its very good.
Nice sweet nose on this, light caramel some soft spice coming through. Vanilla? Nice fullish body to it, sweet at first, rounds out but not totally smoothly. Plenty of nice spice going on lingers well on the palette. Very drinkable!
17 more reviews were collected for this bottle. The longest ones are shown first.
Tastes like this
Same style and price bracket, best rated first.