Rating: 13/23 N: It smells oily with some orange, bit of apple, and faint hint of apricot. Otherwise, there isn't a ton going on here. P: It's oily and youthful. It's spicy and kind of floral like rye with a bit of sugary sweetness and some minerality. I think I get a dash of pear or something in with the floral sweetness. There is some of the orange, but not a ton. There's some harshness in here, but it isn't overwhelming. There's actually a decent amount of subtle complexity here, but it's merely adequate and doesn't make up for how young and otherwise lacking this is. The harshness is really quite strong. F: The sweet minerality, pear, and sort of a jasmine floral flavor linger along with some vague references to spices and an unreasonably (though perhaps not unexpectedly for a grain whiskey) large amount of harshness. - Conclusion - This is a grain whiskey. It tastes like a grain whiskey. Maybe it's not as young as it tastes, but I can't tell for sure. I'd probably put this above Jameson Distiller's Safe, but below Jameson Cooper's Croze. None of the three achieve the quality of Redbreast 12 Cask Strength. This isn't bad, but it does seem quite in the mediocre range. Considering the oiliness, I thought that Sir Edward's 12 would be a fair comparison. Side-by-side, Sir Edward's is smoother and richer, but perhaps a bit more muddled and sulfuric. This has more deeply subtle complexity, but It's also lighter with more of an alcohol flavor and more harshness. The easily accessibility of Sir Edward's makes it a strong contender in this comparison. Considering how this fares against Sir Edward's, I think that I could go as low as a 10 on this. To some extent, this being a light Irish grain whiskey meant that it would just never be my jam, but even looking at measures I know others will be using, I don't like this. I'd take this over regular Jameson because the profile is more interesting here, but I think I recall Jameson being a smoother product as well, so they're closer than I expected. Considering the light, floral, caramel nature, I find myself wanting to compare this with Ancient Age as well. Again, the qualities are surprisingly close. I would place this above regular Ancient Age, but it's not tremendously higher. They're actually very close in quality. I want to give this a higher rating, but I keep trying things that I gave middling or lower scores in the past and thinking "huh, these are pretty close in quality". I was for a while thinking that this could be as low as a 10, but now I'm thinking that even an 11 would be too low. I'm leaning toward a 13, but this could be a 12 because of the harshness. A 14 is probably not happening. I'm going for a 13. 12 is a solid possibility though.
About this bottle
Part of Jameson's 2016 Whiskey Makers Series, which emphasizes different aspects of the production process through the lens of one of Jameson's Heads (Head Blender, Head Cooper, Head Distiller). The Blender's Dog is, of course, the Head Blender Billy Leighton's bottling. The forgotten art in the process of whiskey making, blending is essential to creating complex, harmonious, and consistent products from batch to batch. Leighton's weapon of choice is a "dog," a small container on the end of a chain (a leash?) that he uses to extract samples from each cask. The final product is a marriage of grain and of pot still whiskeys aged in ex-bourbon and in ex-sherry casks. Bottled at 43% ABV, this whiskey is non-chill filtered. Available in the US as of November 2017.
Reviews
Showing the most detailed of 31 parsed reviews.
The second of the three Whiskey Makers Series bottlings to be released stateside, this one could only be a bit of a letdown after the sheer beauty of its predecessor, The Cooper's Croze. While that one was nearly a five star whiskey for me, this is a solid four. Now, that's hardly a bad thing - 4/5 ain't bad. But...it lacks the dynamism and "wow!" factor of Cooper's Croze. Gone is the playful, exuberant interplay between the various wood influences; now, the blender is the focus, and this blender is a bit more keen on making...well, a blended Irish whiskey. It's most certainly a *good* Irish blend, with a high percentage of pure pot still lending a rich, spicy fruitiness to the dram, but it loses some of the distinctiveness of its predecessor bottling in the series. If you were to set up a blind tasting with this and a few other pot still heavy blends, I don't know that I would be able to pick this out immediately. It is a worthy dram on its own, rich and fruity with a lovely touch of spice and vanilla, but for the price, I'd hope for a little more sparkle.
Smooth and very easy drinking. Nice flavor profile of fruity/sweet. Not much of a challenge here- but frankly sometimes a clean, refreshing whiskey that gets down easy it just what you want. It doesn’t happen all that often for me, but when I’m in that frame of mind, this will fit the bill. I’m glad to have received it as a gift - it will fill a niche in my whiskey cabinet that was missing.
Nose: vanilla sweetness, warming spices and fruits. Apple. Some alcohol burn. Buiscuit. Palate: first soft, then spices, vanilla sweetness Finish: sweetness, spices. Some oaky dryness. With water: more friendly for me. Nose is same with no alcohol notes. On palate and finish much softer, less spicy, nuts. But very weak aftertaste.
Very smooth and drinkable whiskey. I’m not a fan of Irish whiskeys due to there triple distillation which I feel takes the guts of it. Even thou the nose and taste or minimal, the finish is very long with tastes of oak and baked bread. I still have a wonderful taste minutes later.
Jameson Blenders Dog is the second release in the distillers series. This is not as successful of an attempt. The typical flavors of a good irish single pot still are present but an unexpected bitterness on the back end. detracts. Still a proper Irish Whisky but not the best showing.
25 more reviews were collected for this bottle. The longest ones are shown first.
Tastes like this
Same style and price bracket, best rated first.